A dispute over South Dakota’s proposed shortening of the deadline for citizen-initiated ballot petitions has reached Federal Court in Minnesota.

Last week, appeals judges on the Eighth Circuit in St. Paul heard arguments over a South Dakota law enacted in 2025 that moved the petition filing date from the first Tuesday in May to the first Tuesday in February.

Opponents of the change argue that the task of requiring the necessary number of signatures to place an item on the ballot is greatly compromised with three fewer months to work with. Supporters say the change gives officials more time to confirm the signatures and resolve legal disputes before votes are cast.

Currently, an initiated law needs 17,508 valid signatures and a constitutional amendment requires 35,017 in South Dakota.

READ MORE: Tips To Protect Yourself From Storm Repair Scams This Summer

The case in question, Dakotans for Health v. Johnson, references South Dakota House Bill 1184, the 2025 law that pulled the filing deadline forward to February and that a federal district judge blocked last year as unconstitutional. The district court’s permanent injunction found that the February filing date was inconsistent with First Amendment protections for petition circulation and held that portion of the law could not be enforced.

It will be a while before the appeals panel makes its final decision on the matter. A ruling isn't expected until at least late summer.

KYBB-FM / B102.7 logo
Get our free mobile app

YEAR IN REVIEW: 2025 in Powerful Photos

Fueled by a nonstop news cycle, 2025 unfolded in real time with historic change, political tension, and powerful emotion. These photos capture the moments that shaped the year.

Gallery Credit: Stephen Lenz

LOOK: Major US city skylines in photos, then and now

Stacker consulted photo archives and the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat to see how 15 U.S. city skylines evolved in the past century.

Gallery Credit: Stacker

LOOK: Unique baby names from the year you were born

Stacker highlighted one of the least-used baby names from each year between 1950 and 2022, using data from the Social Security Administration.

Gallery Credit: Stacker

More From KYBB-FM / B102.7